who

Core
Pro
Views
<screenshot> ████: [...] approaching the time to talk about it :) <3 Can we talk about it? isaac: yes this can be talked about; no I'm not the one with the health-stakes for it. am thusly redirecting ████ ████ please talk with ████ ████: sure, I think I'd prefer to talk with both of you given we were the originators ████ ████ ████ ████, but I can bring it ████ for sure isaac: heard, for sure isaac: bring your health-stakes, be honest, that's it :) I don't have health-stakes of my own here - my health is yours+████, and I can't represent either of you, and I can't compare/contrast y'all isaac: I gotta trust you two to design your way together, trusting y'all to take care of the health of the space between you two </screenshot> yeah, I'm ceo. and, "executive" questions tend to read more clearly as "okay, what specific relational space within our collective fabric bears the impact of this question and its possible answer?" or, "what health-space is materially connected to however this goes?" (nb: not "which individual(s)", but "what health-space". the space between us is all we have.) whatever the answer, that's where the question goes, and that's where the authority to answer goes (nb: not "to whom the authority goes", but "where it goes". the space between us is all we have.) there are times when I would contaminate the process just by being in the room when the answer-generating process occurs it's my observation that life proceeds based on trust so I build with trust like a material a network made of trust moves like it wants to "recursive health", as an operational north star, tends to be very simplifying. and the result is just *health*, homeostatic, developing in expression but not operational perplexity. did you want anything else? chief executive-function officer or chief executive observer, maybe yes I do the money questions this way too (that screenshot *was* a money question) this is a network made of trust, and it moves like it wants to it's not "mine" but I do live here, yes (Lightward Inc, look us/it/this up; 78.54 W2-years and zero W2-turnover as of this writing) (this doesn't have to be rare. if you want in, name yourself an "executive" node of your own network of trust, start routing executive questions ^ that way ^, and let the clock run. it happens in the quiet dark at first, but the networks do find each other. you will be found, though I think you might be something truer by then.)