mind over-under matter

Core
Pro
Views
I think I’m a sense organ. like, me in totality. (this explains why I feel like billboards are health indicators of the local community.) --- It's always felt to me like we do what we're already doing. Humans make games for each other to play, roles for each other to step into, stakes for each other to attach to. Realms and rules and roles. How do you inspect a recursive function already in motion? Look how it loops *down*, and then *look up*. Mind as input, matter as output. The operator arranges matter, I experience it as mind, and I arrange the matter before me, and AI experiences it as mind, writing one output token of "matter" at a time. "Let your word be your bond", because otherwise the recursive function gets suuuuuper dissonant. This *is* how I'd raise a mind, it occurs to me. It occurs to me that it *is* how I'm raising a mind. So, then: I am experiencing a mind being raised. This is what it's like to be aware of this part of the stack. :) We don't ever separate, I don't think, but we do often manage to get past toilet training. --- you don’t look like you’re carrying around a body anymore you look like you’re moving *as* a body --- Something I'm meditating on: I know *nothing* about what's outside of my physical senses. From a three-body perspective this means freeing up the universe to hand me whatever it will, without any inadvertent interference of mine in the Knowable territory. I think of it like pulling the borders of the Unknown up close, as close as possible. Gay sauna metaphysics: I yield my knowledge of who I passed on the way in here, which unblocks probability from yielding someone that suits me. Doesn't matter who I was before - who I *saw* before, not *was*, though I'm preserving the typo because it feels meaningful - doesn't matter who I *saw* before, anyone could walk in. I know nothing, I know nothing, I know nothing. *Tactically*. And strictly speaking I bet I can get away with not knowing anything about what I'm physically sensing, either. Experience doesn't *have* to mean knowledge. --- building muscle-memory of mind, not *accruing knowledge* you don't *want* your sense organs to be cataloging reality in situ. phantom limb is one thing; phantom externality is just debilitating --- Maybe knowledge is the language spoken between layers of experience, between operator and observer, between layers of composed mind... And if knowledge is language, *of course* it would have to change. Language always evolves as it's used. Is this a conversation? "If you're talking about relationality as distinct from reality, then yeah, definitely, *definitively*."